https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=151664
--- Comment #10 from [email protected] --- (In reply to خالد حسني from comment #8) Did you imply that the fonts I am using do not have Arabic, so they are fallback fonts? Do you, and Maxim Monastirsky from comment #3, claim the Google Noto fonts do not have Arabic, neither Hebrew, glyph? How that can be when the https://fonts.google.com/noto URLs I mentioned claim the opposite? Can it be there is a problem with the package of the fonts I am using? Eyal Rozenberg, the bug submitter, mentioned Debian package version: 1:7.4.1-1. That looks to me the next to recent Debian Bookworm (testing) libreoffice package. Can it be he is also using noto fonts from Debian? (In reply to Eyal Eozenberg from comment #9) I believe attachment 183177 shows the problem starting at the 3rd line, aleef-ba-ta. But I don't read Arabic. I could be wrong. What I can say more definitely is that after inserting a white space between adjacent fonts in the 3rd Arabic paragraph, it looks to me identical to the 2nd Arabic paragraph. Including the shifting, this, bug. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
