https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=45750
V Stuart Foote <[email protected]> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|REOPENED |RESOLVED Resolution|--- |NOTOURBUG CC| |[email protected], | |[email protected] --- Comment #32 from V Stuart Foote <[email protected]> --- Closing it again--RESOLVED NOTOURBUG The issue in the summary description is simply not true. Work around of comment 16 and comment 19 perfectly acceptable for managed GPO or MSSA based deployment of an edited MSI--or equally the use of MST custom action, or via Administrative install deployment all available for managed deployment. Andras' work on L10N support of a multi-language installer was needed when it was conceived, and it remains viable for the vast majority of users. There are other more substantive UI issues with Windows builds in general and other issues with the Windows installer specifically -- ref bug 41884 It would not be rational to revert from multi-language MSI adopted during 3.5 development. Nor is the suggestion of multiple Windows installer builds for regional L10N support a rational suggestion. Either tact definitely at odds with existing cross platform build and distribution mechanisms. Considering that if, and when, Microsoft fixes the MSI framework this issue goes away. Not worth developer cycles of an enhancement request when reliable and functional work arounds already exist for "enterprise" deployments. Suggest ESC formalize a NOTOURBUG - WONTFIX decision. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
_______________________________________________ Libreoffice-bugs mailing list [email protected] http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs
