https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=148955
Buovjaga <[email protected]> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |enhancement Summary|Cannot load my Libre 4 |Display the full path name |custom .soc/.sog files into |of the .so[cgb] file in the |Libre 7 [CONFIG] |Area dialog CC| |libreoffice-ux-advise@lists | |.freedesktop.org Whiteboard| QA:needsComment | Keywords| |needsUXEval --- Comment #2 from Buovjaga <[email protected]> --- (In reply to gearhead from comment #1) > UPDATE: > I must have done something right : ) > The Area-Style/Filling drop-down list (when set to Gradient) now lists > my custom gradients, in ideal [swatch][name] format. Wunderbar! > > The Area dialog (Area tab) also shows the same custom gradients, but > in less-readable and harder-to-identify [swatch-only] format. > > REMAINING ISSUES: > I believe this custom palette is the SINGLE BEST FEATURE of Libre for > engineers and scientists. To make it more robust and less frustrating > for these users, I'd still request the following needed fixes: > > a. Restore the [Load] button -- as indicated on my attachment -- > enabling users to quickly select between custom .so[cgb] files. Bug 120369 > b. Display the full pathname of the .so[cgb] on the dialog. > How can users hand-edit these files (as Heiko recommends) if we have > no idea where the tool is getting them? I suspect it sometimes looks in: > C:\Users\..\AppData\Roaming\LibreOffice\4\user\config, for example. > > c. Restore the [swatch][name] format to all Fill-related dialogs, perhaps > as a Libre option under Tools > Options > Colors. Swatches alone > are hard to sort out -- especially when months have gone by since > you created a new color or gradient. UX team can comment on these. One issue per report, though. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
