https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=153534
--- Comment #10 from Eyal Rozenberg <[email protected]> --- (In reply to the design committee session minutes) > + every single page style has a use case (Cor) No, some of them don't: (5.) Footnote (9.) Left Page (10.) Right Page as I have explained even before the committee session and further clarified afterwards. Another has a use case which is suspect: (6.) HTML See comment #3 and comment #4. others may have a use case, but LibreOffice itself doesn't "respect" this use case: (7.) Index see comment #8. and there's the fact that such a "use case" has not resulted in a "Table of Contents" page style, so another inconsistency there. > + never had any problems with the list of page styles (John) 1. I never had any problems with most things I read bug reports about... this could be an argument for reducing the importance to minor, not for whether or not it's a bug. 2. I don't know John's QA experience, but his name suggests he's not an RTL language user. For us, the "Left Page", "Right Page" is a more serious problem than it would be for him (for which reason I would oppose making this bug minor). > + the (small) list can also be filtered (Heiko) Don't see how this is an argument against or in favor of the validity of this bug. This isn't a report about me having personal dislikes of certain styles - which would be solved by some kind of personalized filtering. And, of course, if we filter to only show the styles "in use", we'll not see any legitimate options in a new document except for the Default Page Style. If Heiko was suggesting some page styles be hidden from the user by default - e.g. the page styles which are intended for automatic application, like "Endnotes" - that would better legitimize their being part of the list of styles. Perhaps a separate issue should be opened about this. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
