https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=149570
--- Comment #10 from Tomaz Vajngerl <[email protected]> --- (In reply to Eyal Rozenberg from comment #9) > It was not _necessary_. You mean to say, it was a hack which avoided a > problem by breaking the feature with which the problem manifstered. As I said the change was necessary to make it work with multiple views / users. It's not a hack, it's actually conceptually the right way and the only way to do it that makes sense (concurrently). The hack was the initial code, which was hacking around with the primary undo stack. If there is a bug it's just something that tests don't cover and was missed during implementation. > So, let us file _that_ bug and fix it. That was fixed by the commit... > ... which is also a bug, is it not? It was intentionally done like that before and I just didn't change the behavior. It surely would be nicer to have all the actions even when you leave the editing mode append into the primary undo stack. > So, is it also possible to perform several distinct undoable tasks with a > textbox? and that only this entering-the-edit-box thing prevents us from > being able to undo them individually? It should be possible to just copy all the actions over, but I haven't explored that. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
