https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=155087
--- Comment #48 from Gabriel Masei <[email protected]> --- (In reply to cipricus from comment #39) > (In reply to Gabriel Masei from comment #33) > > (In reply to Mike Kaganski from comment #24) > > I think another rule can be identified: a wrong form should never be > auto-corrected when multiple correct forms are possible. I think that this case falls under the rule no. 2: if you have multiple replacements for the same wrong form and you have to choose one of them then there is a chance that the choice could be a wrong one. So I think that there is no need for a separate rule. However, if there is a good chance that this case could be unintentionally skipped then an extra sentence to the rule no. 2 could be added. Something like: This rule covers also the case when there could be multiple replacements for the same wrong form. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
