https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=155946

Eike Rathke <[email protected]> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |[email protected]
     Ever confirmed|0                           |1
             Status|UNCONFIRMED                 |NEW

--- Comment #3 from Eike Rathke <[email protected]> ---
(In reply to Eyal Rozenberg from comment #2)
> (In reply to Eike Rathke from comment #1)
> > Not necessarily. 
> 
> Not necessarily what?
Not necessarily this:
>> but even "first separator encountered" is better than what we have now.


> Give the memory we have of the user's last choice, the simple heuristic
> might be: "User's last choice, unless the text doesn't have that separator
> (or even - unless the first line doesn't have), in which case the first
> separator which appears on the first line."
With that we're back to "what is considered to be a separator".
a) the arbitrary comma encountered in a sentence?
b) or only if there's not a blank following?
c) if the first comma is at the end of line, does it constitute a separator?

I'd say no to a) and yes to b) and c).
Can that be generalized also for Tab and semicolon? Probably yes.
Can it for Space? No because it would split a sentence into fields.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

Reply via email to