https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=155740
--- Comment #9 from Eyal Rozenberg <[email protected]> --- (In reply to Heiko Tietze from comment #8) > (In reply to Eyal Rozenberg from comment #7) > Since we do open-source business my _opinion_ has as much value as anyone's > else. In most cases I agree with (or trust) Mike as he has the meritocracy > of senior development with client relation and ask-libreoffice experience. I wasn't suggesting Mike's opinion is of less merit. The question is whether it's Mike's decision to close a bug as WONTFIX immediately after opining about it - which is like claiming that there is to be no arguing with his opinion. The approach I've see you take (and which I believe is the appropriate one) is saying what you believe should happen with the bug (e.g. writing "=> WF" or "=> NOTABUG"); letting other there voice strong objections/counter-arguments; then acting. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
