Petr Mladek wrote: > > One way to address this and still allow identifying which RC this is > > easily would be to implement my suggestion from > > https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=42239. This way, the about > > dialog in RC3 would look somewhat like this: > > > > LibreOffice 3.5.0 > > Build ID: libreoffice-3.5.0.3 > > [snip] > > 3. Omit "rcx" in the last planed release candidate. > > The danger is that it might include blocker. We might need another > rc and it will not be easy to distinguish them. > Hi Petr, all,
I wonder if the "LibreOffice 3.5.0" plus tagname is a reasonable compromise? I.e. for RC builds, drop the "LibreOffice 3.5.0 betaX" product name postfix - since RCs behave like final in other ways, and the tagname libreoffice-3.5.0.3 is descriptive enough? I would personally *hate* any solution that needs re-doing *any* work on build hosts & mirrors, just for getting one string fixed. ;) Cheers, -- Thorsten
pgpbJYFTU0upg.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list Mail address: Libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org Change settings: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-qa Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice-qa/
