Hi,
On 25/02/2012 10:19, Pedro wrote:
e-letter wrote
Recent comments in the 'users' mailing list indicate that manual
testing is insufficient. What is the procedure to expand the quantity
and quality of manual tests?
To improve software quality, especially with reference to regression
of previous bugs, a selection of manual tests based upon certain bugs
should be included in the manual test QA.
That is quite interesting because what seems insufficient is the number of
people doing QA :)
There are plenty of automated tools for testing under Linux (e.g. Litmus)
but unfortunately I don't know any tool that works under Windows.
Just a note, the tests that we run under Litmus are for all systems, you
can find them here
https://tcm.documentfoundation.org/
anybody is invited to participate in English or in his mother language,
no problem.
Kind regards
Sophie
--
Founding member of The Document Foundation
_______________________________________________
List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list
Mail address: Libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org
Change settings: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-qa
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice-qa/
