On Fri, 2012-06-15 at 14:01 +0200, Florian Reisinger wrote: > Am 15.06.2012 13:27, schrieb Petr Mladek: > > Hi Florian, > > > > On Thu, 2012-06-14 at 10:07 +0200, Florian Reisinger wrote: > >> Hi! > >> > >> I am not sure anyone has seen my suggestion: > >> > >> Alpha 1: 3.6.0a1 > >> Beta 1: 3.6.0b1 > >> RC 1: 3.6.0r0 > >> RC 2: 3.6.0r1 > > Ah, this does not work because we could not mention "r" (same as "rc") > > in the about dialog. We do not want to rebuild/upload new build just to > > remove this string for the final release. > > Why does this not work. To be honest: We never publish RC 1, but what we > do is publishing the RC 2, which would be r1....
This is not true. For example, we released LO-3.3.3-rc1 or 3.3.4-rc1 as final. Also sometimes needed more release candidates, for example, LO-3.4.1-rc3 or 3.4.2-rc3. Also I am sorry but I do not understand your logic. "r" is shortcut for "release candidate". As I said, we did not want this in the about dialog because users were confused. IMHO, it does not matter what number we use behind (0,1,2,...). It still means release candidate. Or did I miss anything? Best Regards, Petr _______________________________________________ List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list Mail address: Libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org Change settings: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-qa Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice-qa/