On Thu, 2012-06-14 at 11:10 +0200, Rainer Bielefeld wrote: > Petr Mladek schrieb: > > >>>> [Second schema] > >>>>> 3.6.0.00x for alphas > >>>>> 3.6.0.0x0 for betas > >>>>> 3.6.0.100 for RC (example) and/or release > >>>>> 3.6.0.200 for RC (example) and/or release > >>>>> 3.6.0.200 for release(example)
> Hi Petr, > > this Idea should not exclude additional information, of course we should > include tha "Alpha" and "Beta" Text. But I wanted to have all > information in the Version number to avoid problems with different sort > handling (you saw the strange Bugzilla sorting). > > I think we should not use different separators, you never know whether > some system (Wiki, OpenHatch, Whatever) might have it's own ideas what > alphabetical sort order might be. > > Complete Version concerning this suggestion would be: > > Help / About Bugzilla Picker > ------------------------------------------ > 3.6.0.000alpha0+ 3.6.0.000alpha0+ > 3.6.0.001alpha1 3.6.0.001alpha1 > 3.6.0.002alpha2 3.6.0.002alpha2 > 3.6.0.010beta1 3.6.0.010beta1 > 3.6.0.020beta2 3.6.0.020beta2 > 3.6.0.030beta3 3.6.0.030beta3 > 3.6.0.100 3.6.0.100 rc > 3.6.0.200 3.6.0.200 rc > 3.6.0.200 3.6.0.200 release > > Advantage of that system is that it is only an expansion of the existing > one (RC1 3.6.0.1 becomes 3.6.0.100) > > Alternative System, not compatible with current one > > Help / About Bugzilla Picker Info > -------------------------------------------------------- > 3.6.0.00alpha0+ 3.6.0.00alpha0+ > 3.6.0.01alpha1 3.6.0.01alpha1 > 3.6.0.02alpha2 3.6.0.02alpha2 > 3.6.0.11beta1 3.6.0.11beta1 > 3.6.0.12beta2 3.6.0.12beta2 > 3.6.0.13beta3 3.6.0.130beta3 > 3.6.0.21 3.6.0.21 rc > 3.6.0.22 3.6.0.22 rc > 3.6.0.22 3.6.0.22 release > 3.6.1.21 3.6.1.21 rc Ah, I do not like much these schemes because: + the number is too long and thus harder to parse and memorize + it duplicates the information about alpha/beta ordering; you have 01alpha1 (1 is there twice), 02alpha2 (2 is there twice) + I have never seen this anywhere else. I would prefer to use something that people are used to Why about the following scheme? Help / About Bugzilla Picker Info ------------------------------------------------------ 3.6.0.0.alpha1 3.6.0.0.alpha1 3.6.0.0.beta1 3.6.0.0.beta1 3.6.0.0.beta2 3.6.0.0.beta2 3.6.0.1 3.6.0.1 rc 3.6.0.1 3.6.0.2 rc It is actually your proposal, so I hope that it works for you. I consider it as the best compromise from what I have seen. > Unfortunately I see no way to shorten this more than "Alternative > System" shoes, except we accept M. Stahl's suggestion what counts a > 3.7.0 as some kind of beta ;-) > > For the Bugzilla Picers I only want 1 Master for 3.6, one for 3.7, ... > Also for the Branch I only want 1 Picker Version, may be > > 3.6.0.000alpha0+ Master > or > 3.6.0.001alpha1+ Daily (Or Branch or ...) I see, you are talking about daily builds. If we agree on the above scheme, we could have: Help / About Bugzilla Picker Info ------------------------------------------------------ 3.7.0.0.alpha0+ 3.7.0.0.alpha0+ daily 3.7.0.0.alpha1 3.7.0.0.alpha1 3.7.0.0.alpha1+ 3.7.0.0.alpha1+ daily 3.7.0.0.alpha2 3.7.0.0.alpha2 3.7.0.0.alpha2+ 3.7.0.0.alpha2+ daily 3.7.0.0.beta1 3.7.0.0.beta1 3.7.0.0.beta1+ 3.7.0.0.beta1+ daily 3.7.0.0.beta2 3.7.0.0.beta2 3.7.0.0.beta2+ 3.7.0.0.beta2+ daily 3.7.0.1 3.7.0.1 rc 3.7.0.2 3.7.0.2 rc 3.7.0.3 3.7.0.3 rc/final > A remaining problem is Markus' script adding Target info. Before > 3.6.0aloha it it contained information due to > <https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/BugReport_Details#Whiteboard>. I am sure that the script will be solvable. IMHO, the new proposal make it easier than the current 3.X-1.98.Y and 3.X-1.99.Y approach. > Currently the Idea is to include alpha, beta rc as separate target info > versions, goal is to encourage testers to verify fixes and to give them > better info where the fix will be integrated. IMHO we should reduce > different wordings for the Versions as much as possible, but that > strings are rather long. IMHO, the above proposal is well readable. If it is still to long, we could use "aX" instead of "alphaX" and "bX" instead of "betaX". Well, I somehow prefer the whole word. > Can we try to get a solution until weekend? I am sorry for the long delay between replays. I am not effective in handling too many mailing list. I usually replay faster for mails where I am in CC. Such mails are sorted into the the top-priority-mails folder. Best Regards, Petr _______________________________________________ List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list Mail address: Libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org Change settings: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-qa Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice-qa/