On 24/08/12 17:54, Joel Madero wrote: > Hi All, > > First, thanks for including me in the conference call, I was lost for > half of it but that was to be expected :) > > I just did a search on fdo and I see 24 bugs which are currently in > critical status, were reported > 5 months ago and are yet to have an > assigned developer. These could go on our list of hard hacksI think that > we need to do two things with these: > > a) verify that they are in fact in the right status & if they aren't put > them in the right status with a note to the reporter > > b) determine who, if anyone, could take these on. > > Acknowledging that a bug is critical or worse, a blocker, but letting it > sit is probably not reflecting great on us.
it would be great if there are now enough QA people to get these priorities somewhat consistent; right now i am still convinced that they are all set by the reporters, as high as possible to get attention for their pet bug, and hence ignorable :) (some permissions to allow these only to be set by known QA/dev people would help, but i guess it's currently not possible on fdo) _______________________________________________ List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list Mail address: [email protected] Change settings: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-qa Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice-qa/
