Hi *,
Am 25.08.2012 11:30, schrieb Rainer Bielefeld:
Joel Madero schrieb:
.... we will leave the bug in this status for 6 months
that's to long.
+ 1
I close those bugs INVALID if there was no reply.
+ 1
But sometimes there is additional discussion, users try to reproduce and
so on and such bugs sink into oblivion. For those bugs Florinan'
suggested PLEASETEST-reminder (what has not been accepted) might have
had the advantage that a query would have been very easy.
I doubt even the benefit of "PLEASTEST". "NEEDINFO" is IMHO sufficient.
One can add at most "PLEASTEST" to "NEEDINFO" like "RESOLVED WORKSFORME".
I recommend that we agree to a standard sentence like "This bug will be
closed after 14 days if requested information will not be provided.
Additional information concerning the reasons for this proceeding and
how you can reopen this Bug you can find at <jttp://...Wiki...>" , to be
inserted by copy /paste from Wiki.
+ 1
One step more (even shorter):
Not "... how you can reopen this Bug you can find at
<http://...Wiki...>, to be inserted by copy /paste from Wiki." but only
"... how you can reopen this Bug you can find at <http://...Wiki...>"
Note: little spelling mistake: "jttp" -> "http"
Regards
Jochen
_______________________________________________
List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list
Mail address: [email protected]
Change settings: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-qa
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice-qa/
