On Fri, Sep 21, 2012 at 1:56 AM, Roman Eisele <qali...@eikota.de> wrote:

> Hi all,
>
> recently I noticed that some of us start actually using the “QA Contact”
> field, which was neglected for a long time. So I think I must have missed
> something. Is there now a consensus, or a tendency towards a consensus,
> that we actually should use the “QA Contact” field? Should I put myself
> (actually, my mail address ;-) into that field if I “take” a bug for QA,
> i.e. when I feel as the (most) responsible bugwrangler for a particular
> bug? I will be happy to do so, I just want to know if this is recommended
> now ...
>
> Thank you for any hints, and best regards --
>
>     Roman
>


I will assign my name to the QA if I am actively working the ticket. or if
I am researching the issue more. This will let others know the ticket is
being look into by the QA

hope this helps
-- 
--
Masekela Walls
Web Security Analyst | Senior Server Administrator
Powserve.com / Gemini ISP Networks
_______________________________________________
List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list
Mail address: Libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org
Change settings: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-qa
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice-qa/

Reply via email to