Hm I have mixed feelings about these requirements. I think that what it says is "this person prioritized the bug and did initial testing". Personally if you say that any person who adds their name to there has become indefinitely responsible for a vast number of tasks including but not limited to bt and bibisecting, it will scare away valuable QA people.
I think that the first QA person who changes the status should add their name. If additional things are requested that QA person will either: 1) Do the additional testing themselves 2) Find someone else to do it One good thing about this method is if we see QA members names there we can assume (mostly logically) that prioritizing was done and thus in the long run we can abandon all the lists we have and just go by the prioritization of the bug which would be amazing. Thoughts? Joel -- *Joel Madero* LibreOffice QA Volunteer jmadero....@gmail.com
_______________________________________________ List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list Mail address: Libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org Change settings: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-qa Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice-qa/
