Stephan Bergmann-2 wrote > I wonder whether it would not > make most sense to drop LOdev's special handling of user profiles and > instead educate people on how to manually set up an installation's user > profile behavior to suit their specific needs:
IMO asking for user input is better than "educating". Of course, when you ask for user input you are also limiting and controlling the odd scenarios (i.e. instead of the installer having to predict all oddball situations, the user will provide the needed information and the software only has to adapt to one or two different combinations...) Forcing people to comply to a perfect situation from a developer's point of view will alienate users. So my only point is: if the devs want users to do early testing they should be prepared to listen ;) -- View this message in context: http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/Libreoffice-qa-minutes-of-ESC-call-tp4020292p4020576.html Sent from the QA mailing list archive at Nabble.com. _______________________________________________ List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list Mail address: Libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org Change settings: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-qa Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice-qa/