Hello, I think there should be link to http://www.libreoffice.org/get-involved/too, to get more manpower for libreoffice. (And Get involved page must be redesigned in future - less text, more action...).
Some get involved pages: https://www.mozilla.org/en-US/contribute/ http://www.gnome.org/get-involved/ Medieval 2012/11/30 Stefan Knorr (Astron) <heinzless...@gmail.com> > Hi all, > > Rainer wrote this: > > I like it! And I have some proposals for additions. > > Very helpful, thanks. I think I included a bit of almost everything > you said when I updated the page. > > > On 29 November 2012 21:23, Michael Meeks <michael.me...@suse.com> wrote: > > Hah :-) so - JFYI - when people click on send-feedback, we now > have > > more details about their systems: the exact version of the software > > they're running, the platform, the component (writer, base etc.) and > > more. That would need propagating to "file a bug" of course; > > Sure. Keep in mind, what I did is intended as a mockup, not as a final > implementation. I think I left out everything that was harder to do, > for Rob. I didn't know we add version strings to the feedback URL now, > though. That's definitely nice progress. > > > > I wonder - Mozilla have done a lot of this work before us - can > we > > re-use their backend infrastructure and share development work on that ? > > it'd suck to re-invent all their data analytics / query processing > > etc. ? > > Here's how I think Twitter v/ Mozilla's system stack up: > > Twitter: > * no need to set up a new hardware/etc. (at least for collecting > feedback; analysing feedback without hardware might be harder) > * verified users => less spam (?) > * many people have Twitter accounts already, so not such a high hurdle > * possible to follow up with users, creating actual contact between > developers/designers/QA'ers/marketeers/... and users > * people might expect us to follow up with them, and when we don't > they become angry (?) > * data becomes Twitter's property not ours > * dependent on Twitter's general mood and API > * probably hard to annotate tweets with LibO/OS version > > i.m.o: > * need to set up hardware > * lots and lots of spam and gibberish > * no hurdle but clicking the Send Feedback button > * impossible to follow up with users > * posts are automatically tagged with LibO/OS version > * data is our property > > The (supposed) ease of use (both to us and the user) and the promise > of having less spam make Twitter seem attractive to me, still. > > > > is prolly beyond us ATM, but ... perhaps worth collecting if > someone > > will do real analytics on it. > > I personally think the feedback is mostly useful for collecting > real-world thumbs-ups/thumbs-downs by region and time.[1] As you said, > actual text analysis is hard, especially if you have to take into > account that our users speak so many languages. > > Astron. > > > [1] There might be the psychological effect that people feel heard, too. > > -- > Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to design+h...@global.libreoffice.org > Problems? > http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ > Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette > List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/design/ > All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be > deleted >
_______________________________________________ List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list Mail address: Libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org Change settings: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-qa Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice-qa/