Hi Michael, all
Michael Meeks-2 wrote > Right - so anyone using 3.5.x or earlier at this stage needs to either > buy commercial support for that version or upgrade (IMHO) there is > ~no-one that I know of interested in providing security fixes / updates > for that tree. I think the BOD should officially set some dates and post them on the wiki. Something like this http://support.microsoft.com/lifecycle/default.aspx?LN=en-us&x=5&y=13&c2=1173 Michael Meeks-2 wrote > What we call that - FWIW I like "End of Life" better than "End of > Support" - because (really) support is a bit misleading and sounds like > an entitlement, and EOL is a well-known acroynm. Is there a better > name ? I believe EOL is fine. The image just needs to be corrected by user "uroveits". I would simply remove that EOL thing until the BOD has some official dates. In any case I think he/she just copied the dates from the release plan... Version 3.5.7 was officially announced on October 18th so it could not be EOL even before it was announced... Maybe he/she meant End of Line or End of Development for the branch??? But doesn't apply (yet) to the 3.6 branch... Cheers, Pedro -- View this message in context: http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/Libreoffice-qa-Lifecycle-of-builds-tp4048583p4048810.html Sent from the QA mailing list archive at Nabble.com. _______________________________________________ List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list Mail address: Libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org Change settings: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-qa Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice-qa/
