Hi Rainer
Rainer Bielefeld-2 wrote > Version info in BZ should show where the bug appeared (or > at least has been observed the first time) The point here is that if a version is past the EOL and nobody will fix bugs in that branch, there is no point in reporting bugs first observed in 3.4 or 3.5 (otherwise you should NOT remove 3.3 from the list either) Rainer Bielefeld-2 wrote > I think End of 2013 we can think about something similar for 3.4. Isn't that up to the BOD to decide? If the EOL was after 6 months why End of 2013? Cheers, Pedro -- View this message in context: http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/Libreoffice-qa-Lifecycle-of-builds-tp4048583p4049029.html Sent from the QA mailing list archive at Nabble.com. _______________________________________________ List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list Mail address: Libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org Change settings: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-qa Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice-qa/
