On Fri, May 10, 2013 at 5:30 AM, Pedro <pedl...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Petr, all > > > Petr Mladek wrote >> The release builds does not have the "+" because they are well defined >> by the related tag. > > Ok. Sounds like a reasonable option. > > Maybe this should be documented somewhere, at least for QA people? Joel? > qubit?
There's a bit of a description on the ReleasePlan page regarding our versioning scheme, however it does not include this particular piece of information: https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/ReleasePlan#Version_scheme As versions are pretty intertwined with the Release process, I guess I'd just expand the Version scheme section on that page, at least until it gets a bit big for the page, then factor it out :-) Regarding version #'s, some useful pieces of information might include: - What builds have a plus sign ("+") in them? - How do we name builds from the master branch? - What is the difference between a minor version release and a Major version release? (e.g. do we allow more API changes/more breakage in the latter?) - A link to the Bug Report page regarding how to choose Version Number for a bug report (just in case a user searches the wiki for version-number information and ends up here) - Any other version-related guidelines/nuances --R _______________________________________________ List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list Mail address: Libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org Change settings: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-qa Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice-qa/
