On Sun, 2013-05-19 at 09:31 -0700, Pedro wrote: > Mirosław Zalewski wrote > > BTW: could developers agree that one feature from top ten on such page > > will be > > implemented for each major release? Or maybe should we go into > > crowdfunding? > > They already said they couldn't/wouldn't compromise with such voting scheme.
I have spent quite a log of time hanging out on the developer list, on the QA list, and in bugzilla. It is my impression that a developer hardly ever spends much time thinking "Ho hum, I wonder what I might find to work on next?". We are in better shape than some commercial projects where I have wasted a pile of time (at my usual outrageours hourly rate <grin />). Let me try to turn the argument around. What have you seen added to LibreOffice that you consider a waste of time? I mean, a waste of time so clear that you are willing to call it as such? This approximates an upper bound on the benefit to be expected from an absolutely perfect, 100% efficent way of assigning work. To prioritze is to posteriorize. Terry. _______________________________________________ List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list Mail address: Libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org Change settings: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-qa Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice-qa/
