Hi all, Pedro is it true, that this has changed? IMHO we had this nasty problem once, but IMO all new bugs should be UNCONFIRMED.
Liebe Grüße, / Yours, Florian Reisinger Am 14.06.2013 um 23:43 schrieb Pedro <pedl...@gmail.com>: > Hi Enervation > > > Enervation wrote >> I reported a bug, which is located at >> https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=65571 >> >> However, it is marked as NEW even though no one triaged it. Can someone >> resolve this? > > This is the default now. Bugs are initially marked as NEW. If additional > information is required it will be changed to NEEDINFO. I'm not sure what a > triager should change it to if it is confirmed... @Joel??? > > > > -- > View this message in context: > http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/Libreoffice-qa-Bug-Report-Incorrectly-Marked-as-NEW-tp4061545p4061555.html > Sent from the QA mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > _______________________________________________ > List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list > Mail address: Libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org > Change settings: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-qa > Problems? > http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ > Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette > List archive: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice-qa/ _______________________________________________ List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list Mail address: Libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org Change settings: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-qa Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice-qa/
