Hi Thomas, Le 28/10/2013 16:19, Christian Lohmaier a écrit : > Hi Thomas, *, > > Am 28.10.2013 05:13 schrieb "Thomas Hackert" <thack...@nexgo.de>: >> Good morning Cor, *, >> On Sonntag, 27. Oktober 2013 18:37 Cor Nouws wrote: >>> Thomas Hackert wrote (18-10-13 10:10) >>>> […] Is there a possibility to report this as >>>> fast and easy as possible? > > Fastest one would be to skip the bug report and instead push a patch to > gerrit. > >>>> Should I open a new bug for every >>>> found one? > > No, that doesn't make sense. > > You would need to create a list of the menu items to decide what entry will > get the most natural one and what entries get second choice or > autogenerated one. > > From my POV it is also important to keep familiar keystrokes intact, so > newly added items should get an automatically assigned one unless there is > a reason not to. > > Finding the place in the source code is not different from finding bad > mnemonics in a translation. Look up the entry in pootle and there you have > the reference. Or grep in the sources. Search in opengrok might also be > possible, but not sure whether you need to escape the mnemonic > marker/whether it includes the character in the search index.
If you grep, just be aware that now there is two kinds of mnemonics: [~] for the previous dialogs, [_] for the ported to .ui dialogs. AFAIK, only the main menus are scripted, the others are placed by the dialog creator or the translators. Kind regards Sophie _______________________________________________ List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list Mail address: Libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org Change settings: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-qa Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice-qa/
