On Sat, Dec 7, 2013 at 3:12 AM, Robert Großkopf <[email protected]> wrote: > Hello *, > > could be I understand this wrong. But in the last months there are many > people setting bugs to "NEEDINFO" which are "UNCONFIRMED". So I get the > feedback from bugzilla > Ever confirmed → Removed 0 → Added 1 > The bug has never been confirmed by any other person than the > bug-reporter. But with setting it to "NEEDINFO" (There is asked for a > better description or for an attachment ...) it seems to be confirmed.
well that is weird! > Example: > https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=72391 > > How do we handle "NEEDINFO"? Probably we hit it* with a big stick until it doesn't automatically set this 'ever-confirmed' flag. Either that, or we figure out a different way to indicate that we want information from the OP or from one of the other commenters/cc'd individuals on the bug. That might require some investment of implementation time... But (as always), this will all need to wait until after we finish the migration. Cheers, --R * i.e. the code _______________________________________________ List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list Mail address: [email protected] Change settings: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-qa Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice-qa/
