On Sat, Dec 7, 2013 at 3:27 AM, Robinson Tryon <bishop.robin...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Sat, Dec 7, 2013 at 3:12 AM, Robert Großkopf > <rob...@familiegrosskopf.de> wrote: >> could be I understand this wrong. But in the last months there are many >> people setting bugs to "NEEDINFO" which are "UNCONFIRMED". So I get the >> feedback from bugzilla >> Ever confirmed → Removed 0 → Added 1 >> The bug has never been confirmed by any other person than the >> bug-reporter. But with setting it to "NEEDINFO" (There is asked for a >> better description or for an attachment ...) it seems to be confirmed.
Interestingly, if/once the bug is set back to 'UNCONFIRMED', that flag is cleared. It's not (as many of us probably assumed) a write-once-never-change field. See an example in the activity here: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_activity.cgi?id=72402 So while I question the logic of setting it at all when the status changes to NEEDINFO, at least bugzilla is cleaning it back up if/when we move status back to UNCONFIRMED. --R _______________________________________________ List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list Mail address: Libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org Change settings: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-qa Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice-qa/