For now I'm not doing this just because there are so many other things to do and as of now I'm not seeing a clear message as to what we're doing....I've seen at least 3-4 proposals with different links and the like. I suggest this be resolved on QA call, finalized, maybe a wiki written as to what the plan is, then we can move forward.
Best, Joel On 11/03/2014 09:06 PM, Tommy wrote: > On Sun, 02 Nov 2014 06:49:35 +0100, Tommy <ba...@quipo.it> wrote: > >> once 4.2.7 and 4.3.3 are now available, I think we could run the >> "please retest" automated message to UNCONFIRMED bugs older than 6 >> months. >> >> actually there's 94 out of them. see list: >> http://snipurl.com/29eckcc >> >> >> let's see what's the feedback ratio and then decide if doing the same >> on older NEW bugs (excluding easy hacks as already discussed in the >> mailing list( >> > > or maybe we could ping older than 100 days bug from this list (193 bugs): > http://snipurl.com/29ejxgd > > > _______________________________________________ > List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list > Mail address: Libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org > Change settings: > http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-qa > Problems? > http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ > Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette > List archive: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice-qa/ _______________________________________________ List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list Mail address: Libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org Change settings: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-qa Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice-qa/
