On Tue, 04 Nov 2014 16:24:44 +0100, Joel Madero <jmadero....@gmail.com>
wrote:
For now I'm not doing this just because there are so many other things
to do and as of now I'm not seeing a clear message as to what we're
doing....I've seen at least 3-4 proposals with different links and the
like. I suggest this be resolved on QA call, finalized, maybe a wiki
written as to what the plan is, then we can move forward.
I agree with you. QA call must decide that.
regarding the multiple links you saw they are only because of different
periods of time selected (1 year, 6 months, 100 days etc etc)... again the
correct timeframe we want to ping has to be decided with the QA team.
moreover we have to decide if pinging just UNCONFIRMED old bugs or even
NEW bugs (excluding the easy hacks).
in recent weeks I've seen many of UNCONF and NEW old bugs turning into WFM
after retest with recent LibO releases (by me or other QA guys like beluga
and Stuart Foote)
---
Questa e-mail è priva di virus e malware perché è attiva la protezione avast!
Antivirus.
http://www.avast.com
_______________________________________________
List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list
Mail address: Libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org
Change settings: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-qa
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice-qa/
