On 06.07.2015 21:44, Bjoern Michaelsen wrote: > On Mon, Jul 06, 2015 at 09:01:11PM +0200, Christian Lohmaier wrote: >>> I think about having "bibisectRequest", "bibisected", "notBibisectable" and >>> other useful terms in it. >> >> For those, maybe we should promote those to actual keywords? >> >> So is it possible: Yes >> Should it be done: depends :-) > > Right. At least from the theoretical standpoint once you have a welldefined > set > of stuff in whiteboard, that are well-known and widely used. Having them a > keywords is the right thing. > > From a practical point of view, we would need to keep things consistent: > - thus removing all those in exsisting whiteboard and adding them as keywords > - not spamming the world to a halt with that bulk change > - update _all_ doce everywhere: in git repositories, wikis and whatnot > - updating all scripts and queries using these everywhere > - announcing the change far and wide > - keeping an eye out for people doing it "the old way" out of habit for at > least half a year > > Im not saying its not possible, just that it is much more work and hidden > costs > that it might initially appear.
haven't we already discussed exactly which whiteboards should be keywords on this list like half a year ago? /me still waiting for his "odf" keyword :) _______________________________________________ List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list Mail address: Libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org Change settings: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-qa Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice-qa/
