Bjoern wrote: >> From a practical point of view, we would need to keep things consistent: >> - thus removing all those in exsisting whiteboard and adding them as keywords >> - not spamming the world to a halt with that bulk change
That's one of the tricky parts -- although we could temporarily disable email notifications (really, it would be nice if Bugzilla had better internal tools for that) On Mon, Jul 6, 2015 at 5:51 PM, Michael Stahl <mst...@redhat.com> wrote: > haven't we already discussed exactly which whiteboards should be > keywords on this list like half a year ago? IIRC, there was some debate about particular details, perhaps with some of the bibisect terms, etc. > > /me still waiting for his "odf" keyword :) File formats are a great example: - Will we have a keyword for 'odf', or one for 'odt', 'odp', 'ods', etc..? - How about for binary MSO formats? - OOXML formats? - etc.. Most people in QA (and nearly all users) aren't as familiar with the filters as the devs are, so a naming structure that seems intuitive to the devs might seem inconsistent to QA. Hopefully there's a happy medium that's easy for everyone to learn/apply, and is useful for the devs. Best, --R -- Robinson Tryon QA Engineer - The Document Foundation LibreOffice Community Outreach Herald qu...@libreoffice.org 802-379-9482 | IRC: colonelqubit on Freenode _______________________________________________ List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list Mail address: Libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org Change settings: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-qa Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice-qa/
