Hi all, As mentioned in the ESC call, it could be helpful to add a new Bugzilla Status that encompasses bugs that have been abandoned/don't have enough data.
=> What type of bugs would this cover? * User isn't willing to share private document with anyone, and we can't reproduce * Bug sits in NEEDINFO status for 6+ months * (other situations?) => Reasoning: * We currently mark abandoned bugs as RESOLVED WORKSFORME, or RESOLVED INVALID, but an additional Status value could help us be more precise in indicating why a bug has been set aside. * An additional Status would allow us to be more diplomatic with tough users, and avoid the potential negatives of "INVALID" or "WORKS FOR ME" on such bugs => Naming: A couple of names for this status have been offered, however new suggestions are certainly welcome. Here are a few suggestions or status values that are currently in use on other bug trackers: * ABANDONED * INSUFFICIENT DATA (RedHat) * EXPIRED (Launchpad) Thoughts on adding a new Status? Suggestions for what name we might use? Please share your thoughts! Thanks, --R -- Robinson Tryon QA Engineer - The Document Foundation LibreOffice Community Outreach Herald qu...@libreoffice.org 802-379-9482 | IRC: colonelqubit on Freenode _______________________________________________ List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list Mail address: Libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org Change settings: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-qa Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice-qa/
