On 11/09/2015 11:15 AM, Bjoern Michaelsen wrote: > On Mon, Nov 09, 2015 at 07:10:44PM +0100, Eike Rathke wrote: >> Insufficient Data though can also be used for situations where a bug can >> not be reproduced due to, well, insufficient data.. i.e. happened one >> time crash and no stack trace, no exact steps to reproduce, even if the >> reporter was or would be willing to provide ... all cases where >> WORKSFORME sounds a bit odd and lax (which is a valid resolution if the >> given steps do not lead to the described failure), but ABANDONED >> wouldn't fit either, IMHO.. > That would almost NEEDINFO. The only difference between NEEDINFO and > INSUFFICIENT DATA is that one is considered resolved, while the other one isnt > and there is no way to see from the wording that NEEDINFO is the unresolved > one > and INSUFFICIENT DATA is the resolved one. Its likely that will lead to > confusion.
I was thinking exactly this and am back to thinking ABANDONED is the best option. We wouldn't go right to ABANDONED. We would go to NEEDINFO - which puts users on notice that we need something, after 6 months, we'd do a follow-up ping saying "hurry up or else..." and then after another month we close as ABANDONED, which seems to describe the situation well. Best, Joel _______________________________________________ List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list Mail address: Libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org Change settings: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-qa Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice-qa/