Hi Pedro, Thanks for bringing this matter again at discussion, even some people is bored of it.
Excuse is always on developers, but I have not appreciated such attitude at least with significant devs, even always there is some exception. There is not a QA work flow for the whole. The results are your conclusions, as I have exposed several times, specially new improvements are not properly, neither improperly, verified. Well maybe I forgot we have only obligations like to do a deep investigation about what test, instead receive an adequate communication about what needs our attention. BTW would be nice listen from the candidates their opinion about concrete matters like this one. Miguel Ángel. -- View this message in context: http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/Libreoffice-qa-Reminder-QA-Meeting-on-Wednesday-tp4167253p4167417.html Sent from the QA mailing list archive at Nabble.com. _______________________________________________ List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list Mail address: Libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org Change settings: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-qa Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice-qa/
