Rene Engelhard wrote >> Assuming that the logic that Stuart mentioned for LibreOffice under >> Windows >> also applies to Linux (it should) then since your LibreOffice >> reports >> "Version: 5.1.1.2" it is the 32bit (x86) version (otherwise it would >> say >> "Version: 5.1.1.2 (x64)") > > It doesn't. Necer saw (x64) there. Probably because a) 64 bit is common > in Linux now whereas it's not in Windows b) most users of Windows don't > even know what they run....
It couldn't be simple and consistent, could it? Regarding your points a) the majority of new machines since Windows 7 do have an x64 OS and b) true (in fact it would be fantastic if people didn't even had to know there is an OS, like in many other devices) I just tested on a Ubuntu 14.04 x64 machine and doing a "file soffice.bin" (located in /usr/lib/libreoffice/program) does report it is 64bit I can confirm that LibreOffice 5.1.1.2 (from the ppa) does not mention x64 in the About dialog box. Sorry for assuming there was some logic :) Regards, Pedro -- View this message in context: http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/More-information-in-About-dialog-tp4177879p4178300.html Sent from the QA mailing list archive at Nabble.com. _______________________________________________ List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list Mail address: Libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org Change settings: https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-qa Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice-qa/
