Hi Rene,
On Wed, 2010-10-13 at 19:54 +0200, Rene Engelhard wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 12, 2010 at 12:13:15PM +0200, Lubos Lunak wrote:
> > On Tuesday 12 of October 2010, Michael Meeks wrote:
> > > Having said that - it looks like this may be some horrendous
> > > compatibility problem between the internal stlport and the system
> > > version - but we'll need to chase that down. Possibly we simply can't
> > > use our own stlport if we link KDE, unclear - Lubos: thoughts ?
> >
> > I don't see the point of using stlport if the system is capable of
> > building
> > KDE, in which case I'd expect the compiler to provide an adequate STL
> > implementation itself.
>
> ABI compatibility to OOo C++ extensions is one. (Though happily only
> for i386 on Linux)
Nasty - so we could be in the position of choosing between KDE
integration, and extension/plugin compatibility ?
Lets hope Caolan's iostream fix hides the problem for now ;-)
Thanks,
Michael.
--
michael.me...@novell.com <><, Pseudo Engineer, itinerant idiot
_______________________________________________
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
