On 24/11/11 21:35, Caolán McNamara wrote: > On Thu, 2011-11-24 at 15:58 +0000, Caolán McNamara wrote: >> On Thu, 2011-11-24 at 23:19 +0900, Daisuke Nishino wrote: >>> I'm not sure if this is related to the problem, but I found an obvious >>> mistake. >>> I hope this patch fixes it. >>> I'm sorry for inconvenience. >> >> aha, excellent. That clear's the most obvious one anyway. Will see if it >> fixes everything, or if the remaining glitch I see is preexisting. > > Indeed, all looks good now. "make subsequentcheck" just fails now I > believe because we have some conversions to "assert" from DBG_ASSERT or > OSL_ENSURE in > SwIndex::operator< so > -o sw.SwXTextEmbeddedObject > -o sw.SwXTextEmbeddedObjects > fail, which is unrelated to the table stuff.
sadly i cannot reproduce this here... (am on revision 48d9feabd967f28bff8e73475f700f2ab009c4bc) > C. > _______________________________________________ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice