On Fri, 2011-11-25 at 11:32 +0100, Michael Stahl wrote: > On 24/11/11 21:35, Caolán McNamara wrote: > > On Thu, 2011-11-24 at 15:58 +0000, Caolán McNamara wrote: > >> On Thu, 2011-11-24 at 23:19 +0900, Daisuke Nishino wrote: > >>> I'm not sure if this is related to the problem, but I found an obvious > >>> mistake. > >>> I hope this patch fixes it. > >>> I'm sorry for inconvenience. > >> > >> aha, excellent. That clear's the most obvious one anyway. Will see if it > >> fixes everything, or if the remaining glitch I see is preexisting. > > > > Indeed, all looks good now. "make subsequentcheck" just fails now I > > believe because we have some conversions to "assert" from DBG_ASSERT or > > OSL_ENSURE in > > SwIndex::operator< so > > -o sw.SwXTextEmbeddedObject > > -o sw.SwXTextEmbeddedObjects > > fail, which is unrelated to the table stuff. > > sadly i cannot reproduce this here... > (am on revision 48d9feabd967f28bff8e73475f700f2ab009c4bc)
Hmm, easy peasy here. Some sort of CntntAnchor at a 0ed SwPosition or something of that nature. Will try and get a bt and/or find where the Anchor position gets created. C. _______________________________________________ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice