> MARKER: These services are not intended to be instantiated via their service > names.
How is it in general with service names, if one browses services.rdb (either of them), one doesn't have to look long to notice components that have identical service names (but different implementation names). What does this mean? That they are not supposed to be instantiated via service names but via implementation names? Sorry if this is a very fundamental question, but I guess I never fully have understood UNO... Hmm, I now see that the first such duplicated service name I come across just visually browsing is css.frame.ContentHandler, which you indeed mark with MARKER in your message. > (And there's unfortunately lots of these, needlessly obscuring things in many > ways.) Indeed. Is there any point at all in cluttering services.rdb (and other configuration files?) with these components if they aren't looked for from there at run-time anyway? --tml _______________________________________________ LibreOffice mailing list [email protected] http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
