Hi Bjoern, Michael came back from vacation on Tuesday and filed the evaluation, so everything is ok there.
Thanks for thinking about us during your holidays thought ;) Regards, -- Cedric On Thu, 2014-06-26 at 16:14 +0200, Bjoern Michaelsen wrote: > Hi Cedric, Hi Fridrich, > > melange is crapping out on me. Neither my bjoern.michael...@gmail.com nor my > bjoern.michael...@canonical.com account lets me take any action/evaluation. As > mst (co-mentor) is on vacation too and possibly hasnt filed this, please > handle > this for me. Thanks. > > Best, > > Bjoern > > On Tue, Jun 17, 2014 at 08:06:30AM +0200, Cedric Bosdonnat wrote: > > The mid-term evaluations are just now! So, head to Google Melange and > > submit them before Friday. In case you really can't fill the evaluation > > your self, ask either your co-mentor or one of your beloved admins > > (Fridrich, Thorsten or myself) to do it. > > > > Below are the questions of the form. > > > > > 1. How many years have you been a mentor for Google Summer of > > > Code (Total - this doesn’t have to be consecutive)? > > > > > > 1. This is my first year > > > > > > 2. 2-3 years > 2. 2-3 years > > > > > > 3. More than 3 years > > > > > > 2. If you answered “2-3 years” or “more than 3 years” as a > > > mentor, what years did you participate? > > > > > > 3. How many years have you been a student in Google Summer of > > > Code? > > > > > > 1. I have never been a student > 1. I have never been a student > > > > > > 2. 1 year > > > > > > 3. 2 years > > > > > > 4. 3+ years > > > > > > 4. If you answered 2 years or 3+ years, what years did you > > > participate as a student? > > > > > > 5. At what point did you first make contact with your student? > > > > > > 1. Before the program was announced > > > > > > 2. After my organization was selected to participate in > > > Google Summer of Code > > > > > > 3. During the student application/acceptance phase of the > > > program > 3. During the student application/acceptance phase of the > program > > > > > > 4. During the community bonding period > > > > > > 5. After the start of coding > > > > > > 6. How often do you and your student interact? > > > > > > 1. Daily > > > > > > 2. Every few days > > > > > > 3. Weekly > > > > > > 4. Every few weeks > 4. Every few weeks > > > > > > 5. Monthly > > > > > > 6. Less than once a month > > > > > > 7. How do you communicate with your student? (Check all that > > > apply) > > > > > > 1. Google+ Hangout > > > > > > 2. Voice (phone, Skype, etc.) > > > > > > 3. IM/IRC > 3. IM/IRC > > > > > > 4. Private emails > > > > > > 5. Mailing Lists > 5. Mailing Lists > > > > > > 6. Student blog updates > > > > > > 7. In-person meeting(s) > > > > > > 8. Other > > > > > > 8. Of the communication methods listed above, which do you use > > > most frequently? > IRC > > > > > > 9. How much time do you spend on Google Summer of Code per week > > > (take into consideration your interactions with your student > > > as well as time working with your org and on your own)? > > > > > > 1. 1-5 hours > 1. 1-5 hours > > > > > > 2. 5-10 hours > > > > > > 3. 10-15 hours > > > > > > 4. 15-20 hours > > > > > > 5. More than 20 hours per week > > > > > > 10. How many time zones apart from your student are you? > > > > > > 1. Less than 3 > > > > > > 2. 3-6 > > > > > > 3. More than 6 > > > > > > 11. How often do you require status updates from your student? > > > > > > 1. Daily > > > > > > 2. Every few days > > > > > > 3. Weekly > 3. Weekly > > > > > > 4. Only when explicitly asked for by me > > > > > > 12. Please rate the quality of your interactions and > > > communications with the student (consider his/her > > > communication with you as well as your responses). > > > > > > 1. Very Good (Student is regularly responsive and the > > > quality of communication is high) > 1. Very Good (Student is regularly responsive and the > quality of communication is high) > > > > > > 2. Good (Student is somewhat responsive and the quality > > > of communication is okay) > > > > > > 3. Bad (Student is only somewhat or not at all responsive > > > and the quality of communication is low) > > > > > > 13. Please rate the quality of the student’s interactions with > > > your organization and community. > > > > > > 1. Very Good (Student is regularly responsive and the > > > quality of communication is high) > 1. Very Good (Student is regularly responsive and the > quality of communication is high) > > > > > > 2. Good (Student is somewhat responsive and the quality > > > of communication is okay) > > > > > > 3. Bad (Student is only somewhat or not at all responsive > > > and the quality of communication is low) > > > > > > 14. Is your student on track to complete his/her project? > > > > > > 1. The student has already completed his/her project > > > > > > 2. He/she is ahead of schedule > > > > > > 3. He/she is on schedule > 3. He/she is on schedule > > > > > > 4. He/she is behind schedule > > > > > > 15. Please rate the quality of code/work the student has produced > > > thus far. > > > > > > 1. Amongst the best people I’ve ever worked with > > > > > > 2. Solid-quality performance > 2. Solid-quality performance > > > > > > 3. Good performance > > > > > > 4. Mediocre performance > > > > > > 5. Disappointing or not performing at all > > > > > > 16. Give an example of a very good or very bad interaction you had > > > with your student. > > Student proactively posts regular status updates to the project mailing list > that give a good overview of ongoing development while still being concise. > > > > > > 17. Anything else you’d like to tell us or suggestions on how we > > > could improve the program? > > > > > > 18. For the midterm evaluation, should this student pass or fail? > > > > > > 1. Pass > 1. Pass > > > > > > 2. Fail > > > > > > 19. If you chose “fail” above, please fill in the reason for > > > failure. > > > > -- > > Cedric > > _______________________________________________ > > LibreOffice mailing list > > LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org > > http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice _______________________________________________ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice