Il giorno martedì 06/09/2011 13:58:35 CEST Ted Smith <te...@riseup.net> ha scritto:
> Ubuntu can be configured to install only free software, and you can > install linux-libre, which makes it as free as Debian is, as far as > I'm concerned. do you know any ubuntu user which have installed the os using only free software repos and also the linux-libre kernel? how many in percent? and, if it makes ubuntu as free as debian, why do not they have installed debian directly? ;-) > I haven't heard any "rumors" about the FSF and "Debian" (Debian is > huge; what part of debian are you talking about?) "discussing" > Debian's freedom status. http://upsilon.cc/~zack/blog/posts/2011/02/squeeze_debian_and_the_FSF/ > Debian's freedom status is clear and > obvious as long as it keeps recommending non-free software. if you meant debian is not completely free (either respect to the FSF guidelines or respect to my personal opinion), I agree: debian installs a "libre" kernel and from the main repo since squeeze (http://www.debian.org/News/2010/20101215), and till today has a 'non-free' repo which can be very easily enabled by users... Regards -- al3xu5 / dotcommon Support free software! Join FSF: http://www.fsf.org/jf?referrer=7535 ______________________________________________________________________ Public GPG/PGP key block ID: 1024D/11C70137 Fingerprint: 60F1 B550 3A95 7901 F410 D484 82E7 5377 11C7 0137 Key download: http://bitfreedom.noblogs.org/gallery/5721/dotcommon.asc [ Please, do not send my key to any keyserver! ]
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
