Because it was in a presentation in January I'm not sure what codecs it was compared to - memory doesn't have that detail back that far. I know they were at the same bit rate though.
On 17 December 2012 19:07, Alexey Eromenko <[email protected]> wrote: > >Maybe mention the storage advantages of ogg compared to mp3? > > Yes, I will. > > On Mon, Dec 17, 2012 at 10:03 AM, Bianca Gibson > <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > Also, I went to a talk about opus early this year. Sounds *much* better > than > > other codecs at low bit rates. > > I don't know - I have tested Opus vs Vorbis vs Wave (lossless CD > quaility) at 48 kbps on $1000 speakers, and they sound about the same > for my ears. I.e. transparent; I was not able to distinguish between > them and original. > Only at 32 kbps I can hear artifacts in Opus. But Vorbis does not > support 32 kbps, only 48 kbps and up. > > -- > -Alexey Eromenko "Technologov" > >
