I think that was through the presenters laptop sound card and a low bit rate - so nothing would sound any good, but opus was noticeably less bad.
On 17 December 2012 19:21, Bianca Gibson <[email protected]>wrote: > Because it was in a presentation in January I'm not sure what codecs it > was compared to - memory doesn't have that detail back that far. > I know they were at the same bit rate though. > > > > On 17 December 2012 19:07, Alexey Eromenko <[email protected]> wrote: > >> >Maybe mention the storage advantages of ogg compared to mp3? >> >> Yes, I will. >> >> On Mon, Dec 17, 2012 at 10:03 AM, Bianca Gibson >> <[email protected]> wrote: >> > >> > Also, I went to a talk about opus early this year. Sounds *much* better >> than >> > other codecs at low bit rates. >> >> I don't know - I have tested Opus vs Vorbis vs Wave (lossless CD >> quaility) at 48 kbps on $1000 speakers, and they sound about the same >> for my ears. I.e. transparent; I was not able to distinguish between >> them and original. >> Only at 32 kbps I can hear artifacts in Opus. But Vorbis does not >> support 32 kbps, only 48 kbps and up. >> >> -- >> -Alexey Eromenko "Technologov" >> >> >
