Dave Crossland <[email protected]> wrote .. > Hi! > > On 23 April 2013 06:32, George Standish <[email protected]> wrote: > > I'd say the software in question fails freedom 0. > > Its GPLv3 so I'm not sure how you reach this conclusion.
As a side note I'd read about this software earlier and wrote to their technical support staff to get a clarification on the license and found it's licensed as GPLv3 only, not GPLv3-or-any-later-version. Disappointing, since anyone using this inherits the problems that come with such a decision.
