On 23 April 2013 22:47, Jason Self <[email protected]> wrote: > Dave Crossland <[email protected]> wrote .. >> Hi! >> >> On 23 April 2013 06:32, George Standish <[email protected]> wrote: >> > I'd say the software in question fails freedom 0. >> >> Its GPLv3 so I'm not sure how you reach this conclusion. > > As a side note I'd read about this software earlier and wrote to their > technical support staff to get a clarification on the license and > found it's licensed as GPLv3 only, not GPLv3-or-any-later-version. > Disappointing, since anyone using this inherits the problems that come > with such a decision.
Yes, that's a pity :( -- Cheers Dave
