Dnia sobota, 11 maja 2013 o 12:31:17 Quiliro Ordóñez napisał(a): > El 10/05/13 16:16, Fabian Rodriguez escribió: > > but I believe publishing under a Creative Commons licence > > > > wouldn't be considered free, specially if there is a "non-commercial" > > use restriction. Perhaps other can provide a better opinion here. > > The only free licenses Creative commons has are: CC-By-SA, CC-By and > CC-0. The others are not free (as in freedom).
Agreed. I'd just like to add that there is a discussion within the Creative Commons community and organisation as to whether or not should the non-free versions (containing -NC, -ND clauses) be stricken from CC license catalogue when CC4.0 arrives. Please note - some CC licenses had already been retired in the past, so it's not as huge a rpecedent as it might seem: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/CC-By#Retired_licenses I personally believe -NC and -ND should be retired so that the confusion about CC licenses being free or not could finally disappear. -- Pozdrawiam Michał "rysiek" Woźniak Fundacja Wolnego i Otwartego Oprogramowania
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
