El 15/05/13 10:16, Will Rico escribió: > GNU and FSF promote the use of CC By-ND, so at least by their > definition, this license can be considered "free" under the > appropriate circumstances: > http://www.gnu.org/licenses/license-list.html#OpinionLicenses >
Making works non-free for the purpose of preserving the intent they were created for is useless. People will use other's works as they see fit anyway. Besides, making them nonfree diminishes the work will do in favor of the intended objective unless the objective is promoting non-freedom. Stallman uses non-free licenses for a good cause but gets results that go the other way. Sometimes compromises work in favor of freedom. But in this specific case, it does not. -- Saludos libres, Quiliro Ordóñez Presidente (en conjunto con el resto de socios) Asociación de Software Libre del Ecuador - ASLE Av de la Prensa N58-219 y Cristóbal Vaca de Castro Quito, Ecuador (02)-600 8579 IRC: http://webchat.freenode.net?channels=asle&uio=OT10cnVlJjEwPXRydWU3a Todo correo que reciba será tratado como información pública, de libre copia y modificación, sin importar cualquier nota de confidencialidad.
