rysiek wrote:
Rather, "Internet of Broken Things":
http://www.reddit.com/r/dredmorbius/comments/26722r/the_internet_of_broken_things/
But yes, the question of retaining software freedom in a world of computing
things is a valid one, and a hard one. There is no silver bullet, and the
market will not solve this one (not that it solved any other important
problems). I think our best bet is (*shudders*) regulation.
It seems to me that that reddit.com discussion all too quickly gets
distracted in a side issue of complexity. People have long lived with
complexity greater than most people understand (depending on what you
look at, humans have never really understood everything we work with).
But this complexity discussion quickly distracts attention away from
treating each other ethically. Perhaps that's the real value of the
complexity argument if you look at this from an "open source"
perspective (the open source movement was founded to distract attention
away from software freedom in order to speak to businesses[1]). We don't
need to understand everything so deeply to understand how to treat each
other ethically. In software, software freedom is a prerequisite for
ethical treatment (I imagine I hardly need to explain that here on
libreplanet-discuss).
The problem of the NSA scandals and Snowden's revelations isn't that
things are more broken than we realize. It's that people are being spied
on constantly in ways they don't realize and spying has long been known
to have powerfully ugly consequences. The spying itself is a direct
contradiction of the brokenness argument -- spying works quite well and
that's why so many spies are interested in it. This spying can sometimes
require nonfree software (such as with DRM); when people have software
freedom they can and do improve software so programs obey the users and
no longer obey the spies.
I think the best approach is an old one -- educate everyone, including
the young, to appreciate software freedom for its own sake and keep on
doing this for generations. I can't think of anything significant that
was obtained with a quick ("silver bullet") approach or by placating a
set of rules engineered to reinforce the rule of the currently powerful
(aka "the market").
[1] See https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/free-software-for-freedom.html
and http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/open-source-misses-the-point.html for
more on this and on how the older free software movement differs from
the younger open source movement.
