On 05/16/2015 03:38 AM, [email protected] wrote:
> But this is all tangential. You and others have failed to provide any
> reasonable justification for RMS' use of ND other than an ill-founded
> claim that it actually helps avoid misrepresentation.
The fact that we have created legal structures that try and create
ownerships for intangible things has caused a great many issues and no
doubt will continue to do so. However that is the current reality we
are all dealing with. The initial question was thought provoking.
Stallman/FSF choosing ND licenses for anything is in the end their
choice to make and does not require a justification be made. Even when
we don't agree with licensing choices (Microsoft) we should still
respect that presently it is their right to choose. I hope you apply in
writing for permission to make your derivative(s) and are granted it. I
apologize if I seemed brash before. Personally I am done with this
thread but I do look forward to other interesting topics.
