Dnia sobota, 16 maja 2015 10:36:16 Will Hill pisze: > I have repeatedly pointed to software owner's attempts to smear and > misrepresent free software advocates and said that this is a good reason to > have ND. It gives us the power to take down the most offensive > misrepresentations of opinion. Yes, there are many other ways software > owners lie and confuse people about free software but having this one power > is helpful. Current law also does nothing to prevent that fraud. People > have argued that things will work out better over all if we could provide > modified works of opinion, but no one has shown me any studdies that prove > it. > > I don't think removing unintentional pauses, changing camera angles, or > providing a good faith transcript are violations of ND terms.
They are. The license states quite clearly: *no derivatives*. Full stop. Ask a lawyer if you're unsure. > Fair use should cover quotes well enough so that this is not an issue. It does. It does not cover translations, for instance. > There are many RMS quote collections, for example. I don't think anyone > will request those are taken down. But if somebody takes RMS's text and makes a song out of it, this can be taken down. And the question is not "would RMS take it down", but "should such a thing be possible to take down at all". -- Pozdrawiam, Michał "rysiek" Woźniak Zmieniam klucz GPG :: http://rys.io/pl/147 GPG Key Transition :: http://rys.io/en/147
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
