Sadly, people are keen to confuse "programming language" with "programming language implementation", because so many languages have only one implementation (C being a notable counterexample). Only the latter is software.
On 4 February 2016 at 09:12, aurelien <[email protected]> wrote: > Koz Ross <[email protected]> writes: > > >> I agree that it would be good to have a list of languages categorized > >> by freedom status and typical use cases for each language. > >> The list would not be comprehensive, but it might still be a good > >> thing to have as a quick reference. > > > > Something like an awesome-languages list? What I mean by this is > > something similar to https://notabug.org/koz.ross/awesome-c or > > https://notabug.org/koz.ross/awesome-gamedev. Disclaimer: I maintain > > both. > > A simple table should be enought and efficient on libreplanet the wiki > of the FSF. > > Kind regards > > -- > Aurélien DESBRIÈRES >
